Difference between revisions of "Draft GPUS Platform Amendment Pension Reform"
Garyruskin (talk | contribs) (Tighten elevator sentence, following edits by Korky Day.) |
Garyruskin (talk | contribs) (Mostly edits from Korky Day.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
'''OUR POSITION: Greens work to ensure that everyone has an adequate retirement income.''' | '''OUR POSITION: Greens work to ensure that everyone has an adequate retirement income.''' | ||
| − | Our current pension system has allowed vast amounts of workers’ hard-earned money to be squandered on job-ending, plant-moving | + | Our current pension system has allowed vast amounts of workers’ hard-earned money to be squandered on job-ending, plant-moving and corporate downsizing. Greens support investing pension funds in ways that meet community needs and benefit workers and their families directly. |
'''GREEN SOLUTIONS''' | '''GREEN SOLUTIONS''' | ||
| − | 1. | + | 1. Require corporate-sponsored pension funds to be jointly controlled by management and the workers, not exclusively by management. |
| − | 2. Require pension funds seek a reasonable rate of return, not simply the prevailing market rate. | + | 2. Require pension funds to seek a reasonable rate of return, not simply the prevailing market rate. |
3. Invest pension funds to create new green-collar jobs and socially beneficial programs. | 3. Invest pension funds to create new green-collar jobs and socially beneficial programs. | ||
| − | 4. | + | 4. Halt the use of pension funds for corporate mergers, acquisitions and leveraged buy-outs without the solid support of workers, as those corporate decisions often undercut workers rights, employment, and retirement while generously rewarding non-productive speculation. |
5. Require that every worker be covered by a retirement plan that supplements Social Security. | 5. Require that every worker be covered by a retirement plan that supplements Social Security. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:57, 27 July 2010
SECTION TITLE: PENSION REFORM
SECTION SUBTITLE: Promoting retirement security
OUR POSITION: Greens work to ensure that everyone has an adequate retirement income.
Our current pension system has allowed vast amounts of workers’ hard-earned money to be squandered on job-ending, plant-moving and corporate downsizing. Greens support investing pension funds in ways that meet community needs and benefit workers and their families directly.
GREEN SOLUTIONS
1. Require corporate-sponsored pension funds to be jointly controlled by management and the workers, not exclusively by management.
2. Require pension funds to seek a reasonable rate of return, not simply the prevailing market rate.
3. Invest pension funds to create new green-collar jobs and socially beneficial programs.
4. Halt the use of pension funds for corporate mergers, acquisitions and leveraged buy-outs without the solid support of workers, as those corporate decisions often undercut workers rights, employment, and retirement while generously rewarding non-productive speculation.
5. Require that every worker be covered by a retirement plan that supplements Social Security.
2004 PLATFORM ON PENSION REFORM
Working people – who own over $3 trillion in pension monies (deferred wages in effect) – should have financial options in where their money is invested apart from the current near-monopoly exerted by a handful of managers, banks, insurance companies, and mutual funds. Pension funds should not be used for corporate mergers, acquisitions and leveraged buyouts, corporate decisions that undercut workers rights, employment, and retirement while generously rewarding non-productive speculation. The current system has allowed vast amounts of American workers’ hard-earned money to be squandered on job-ending, plant-moving, corporate downsizing.
Pension funds are gigantic capital pools that can, with government support, be used to meet community needs and benefit workers and their families directly.
1. Corporate-sponsored pension funds (the biggest category of funds) should be jointly controlled by management and workers, not exclusively by management.
2. Federal law must be changed so that pension funds need simply to seek a reasonable rate of return, not the prevailing market rate which greatly restricts where investments can be made.
3. A secondary pension market established by the government to insure pension investments made in socially beneficial programs must be considered as one method that could greatly expand the impact of this capital market, as demonstrated in the case of federally insured / subsidized mortgage lending.
4. Prudent pension fund investing should both make money and do good work. Creating jobs and supporting employment programs in public / private partnerships can become a priority as we seek to expand towards opportunities where new jobs are created – small business, not transnational business. We could target the under- and un-employed. We believe there are myriad opportunities for a profound shift in how the capital of America’s workers is best put to use.
