Difference between revisions of "Talk:GPCA Strategic Action Plan"
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
WHAT CAN THE GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA ACCOMPLISH IN THE NEXT 10 YEARS? HOW? | WHAT CAN THE GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA ACCOMPLISH IN THE NEXT 10 YEARS? HOW? | ||
| + | |||
SOME SUGGESTED TOPICS OF DISCUSSION: | SOME SUGGESTED TOPICS OF DISCUSSION: | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should GPCA's electoral focus be on localized, "non-partisan" elections? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marnie Glickman: No. | ||
| + | |||
| + | If the focus to be on State-wide office, then should GPCA focus on MOST "winnable seats"? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marnie Glickman: We should focus on great candidates regardless of what kind of seat they run for. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Given the passage of Prop 14, what should our strategy be relating to the new format primary? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marnie Glickman: Defeat open primary in court. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should GPCA continue to be part of the lawsuit against prop 14? Will we raise funds for it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marnie Glickman: Why should we raise money for the lawsuit? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should GPCA continue to be a member of GPUS? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marnie Glickman: Yes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Should GPCA have closer ties with the progressive caucus of the california democratic party? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marnie Glickman: I don't know. Do we have any ties? | ||
| + | |||
| + | What kind of representation do counties/regions/locals want in GPCA? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Marnie Glickman: People who focus on grassroots organizing, not internal organizing. | ||
| + | |||
| + | What services/mutual agreements would counties/regions/locals want from GPCA? | ||
Revision as of 14:13, 12 January 2011
WHAT CAN THE GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA ACCOMPLISH IN 2011 / 2012. HOW?
Kendra, Ventura County: testing Wiki formatting.
WHAT CAN THE GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA ACCOMPLISH IN THE NEXT 5 YEARS? HOW?
WHAT CAN THE GREEN PARTY OF CALIFORNIA ACCOMPLISH IN THE NEXT 10 YEARS? HOW?
SOME SUGGESTED TOPICS OF DISCUSSION:
Should GPCA's electoral focus be on localized, "non-partisan" elections?
Marnie Glickman: No.
If the focus to be on State-wide office, then should GPCA focus on MOST "winnable seats"?
Marnie Glickman: We should focus on great candidates regardless of what kind of seat they run for.
Given the passage of Prop 14, what should our strategy be relating to the new format primary?
Marnie Glickman: Defeat open primary in court.
Should GPCA continue to be part of the lawsuit against prop 14? Will we raise funds for it?
Marnie Glickman: Why should we raise money for the lawsuit?
Should GPCA continue to be a member of GPUS?
Marnie Glickman: Yes.
Should GPCA have closer ties with the progressive caucus of the california democratic party?
Marnie Glickman: I don't know. Do we have any ties?
What kind of representation do counties/regions/locals want in GPCA?
Marnie Glickman: People who focus on grassroots organizing, not internal organizing.
What services/mutual agreements would counties/regions/locals want from GPCA?
