Difference between revisions of "GPCA Strategic Action Plan"

Revision as of 20:29, 20 February 2011

This collection of pages, presented by the state party Committees and Working Groups, presents the current thinking, and an opportunity to comment.

This collection is divided in two groups: a general discussion of strategy (divided into time blocks) and some specific "current topics".

Please Log-in or create an account. Please choose from the links below and click to comment. Please keep your comments fairly short (suggested 300 words or less). Please submit specific, realistic, and action-based ideas. Please do not edit any one else's comments, only your own. Please note who you are and what county you are from. Thank you!

YOU CAN ALSO COMMENT ON THE DISCUSSION TAB IF THIS FORMAT DOES NOT WORK FOR YOU. CONSIDER IT A FREE FLOW PAGE!

General Discussion

• CLICK ON EACH LINK BELOW TO ADD YOUR COMMENTS

• What can The Green Party of California accomplish in 2011/2012? How?

• What can The Green Party of California accomplish in the next 5 years? How?

• What can The Green Party of California accomplish in the next 10 years? How?

Current Topics

• THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS, THESE ARE ONLY SOME TOPICS TO BEGIN CONVERSATION
• YOU CAN ADD TOPICS - ADD THEM HERE

Instructions: click Edit link on right. Double space below the Topic where you want to insert your topic. Type the same characters you see in front of and following the topics below. This is the code that creates a link to a seperate page. Scroll down and click Save Page.

• If you have problems, email Kendra at earthworks_works@yahoo.com

• Should GPCA's electoral focus be on localized, "non-partisan" elections?

• If the focus to be on State-wide office, then should GPCA focus on MOST "winnable seats"?

• How do we recruit & develop electable candidates?

• Given the passage of Prop 14, what should our strategy be relating to the new format primary?

If Proposition 14 prevails then we must join forces with others to expose its problems. It may take an election or two to show problems concerning the lack of competition in the General Election, the pressure and expense of all out primary contests and the lower voter participation. Our objectives should be its removal or to mend it to a ranked-choice electoral system. We must show the folly and the change to make it better. One aspect of our strategy should our ability to use computer social network programs like e-mails, FaceBook and twitter. We will need to provide information to every registered Green, Decline to State and misc. voter. Voters will ask precinct workers for political designation based on my many years of working election precinct polls since only names and occupations will be on the ballot due to Proposition 14. Mailing will be important but if we can use e-mails, FaceBook, twitter and other of these kinds of communications to help lower the mailing price. We should add if those who are e-mailed, FB and etc., these options. 1) A Y/N option to receive mailing or flyers. 1A) for people still need a paper document to help them. 2) Opportunity to help the campaign from canvassing, copying and forwarding mailing or flyers to donations, 3) Candidates should encourage folks they meet while campaigning and express support to take pictures or record support to be downloaded to computer social network system.

• Should GPCA continue to be part of the lawsuit against prop 14? Will we raise funds for it?

• Should GPCA continue to be a member of GPUS?

• Should GPCA have closer ties with the progressive caucus of the california democratic party?

• What kind of representation do counties/regions/locals want in GPCA?

• What services/mutual agreements would counties/regions/locals want from GPCA?

• What factors have caused Locals to deteriorate?

• What are realistic voter registration goals?

• What attracts people to a small party?

• Should we make a real, concerted effort to promote ranked-choiced voting?