Difference between revisions of "Nuclear Contamination"
From CA Greens wiki
Peggykoteen (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Greens support and promote a healthy environment for present and future generations. Therefore, we unconditionally oppose the use of nuclear power, which can not be produced safely | + | Greens support and promote a healthy environment for present and future generations. Therefore, we unconditionally oppose the use of nuclear power, which can not be produced safely nor can its wastes be disposed of safely. |
Ionizing radiation is inherently injurious to life. While unavoidable background levels of radiation exist, we must minimize future releases of human-created radiation into the environment. Any increase in radiation, no matter how small, adds to the cumulative risk for living organisms. | Ionizing radiation is inherently injurious to life. While unavoidable background levels of radiation exist, we must minimize future releases of human-created radiation into the environment. Any increase in radiation, no matter how small, adds to the cumulative risk for living organisms. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* Stop U.S. involvement in international proliferation of nuclear weapons, and sign a meaningful Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. [see Disarmament plank] | * Stop U.S. involvement in international proliferation of nuclear weapons, and sign a meaningful Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. [see Disarmament plank] | ||
| − | * Adopt a policy for the safest possible storage of existing radioactive materials, and discontinue attempting their "disposal" in land repositories. | + | * Adopt a policy for the safest possible storage of existing radioactive materials, and discontinue attempting their "disposal" in land repositories. (What are "land repositories" in this case? This statement is self-contradictory, thus in effect nonsense. Sorry I have no revision for it yet. jgw110617) |
| − | * Rapidly phase out production of electric power from nuclear sources, decommission all existing nuclear power plants and oppose the construction of any new nuclear | + | * Rapidly phase out production of electric power generation from nuclear sources, decommission all existing nuclear power plants and oppose the construction of any new nuclear power plants. |
| − | * Curtail the medical profession's | + | * Curtail the medical profession's over use of radioactive isotopes in diagnostic and treatment procedures, and increase research for alternatives. (Does the GPCA have any responsibility to define how, what and when is "over use"? jgw110617) |
* Recycle medical radioactive materials when possible, and develop storage-to-decay facilities for short-lived medical wastes. | * Recycle medical radioactive materials when possible, and develop storage-to-decay facilities for short-lived medical wastes. | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
* Overturn the Federal Price-Anderson Act, which limits the liability of the nuclear industry in the event of nuclear accidents. | * Overturn the Federal Price-Anderson Act, which limits the liability of the nuclear industry in the event of nuclear accidents. | ||
| − | * Hold all nuclear producers responsible in perpetuity for wastes they generate. | + | * Hold all nuclear producers responsible in perpetuity for (the radioactive) wastes they generate. |
| − | * Establish strong, enforceable penalties for radioactive contamination of the environment. | + | * Establish strong, enforceable penalties for radioactive contamination of the environment. (Needs 1+ concrete examples of contamination levels, types and corresponding penalities. jgw110617) |
* Disallow "deregulation" of any level of wastes to "Below Regulatory Concern" (BRC) status, or their use in consumer products. | * Disallow "deregulation" of any level of wastes to "Below Regulatory Concern" (BRC) status, or their use in consumer products. | ||
| Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
* Establish independent monitoring networks for all military and civilian nuclear facilities. | * Establish independent monitoring networks for all military and civilian nuclear facilities. | ||
| − | * Ban irradiation of food products. | + | * Ban irradiation of food products. (Fact: food radiation kills bad bacteria in the food, does not damage the proteins and other molecules that make food food, and does not leave the food radioactive. Suggested revision: Minimize irradiation of food products and label food products that have been irradiated. jgw110617) |
* Ban nuclear materials in international transportation and trade. | * Ban nuclear materials in international transportation and trade. | ||
* Ban nuclear materials aboard craft launched into space. | * Ban nuclear materials aboard craft launched into space. | ||
Revision as of 03:47, 17 June 2011
Greens support and promote a healthy environment for present and future generations. Therefore, we unconditionally oppose the use of nuclear power, which can not be produced safely nor can its wastes be disposed of safely.
Ionizing radiation is inherently injurious to life. While unavoidable background levels of radiation exist, we must minimize future releases of human-created radiation into the environment. Any increase in radiation, no matter how small, adds to the cumulative risk for living organisms.
Historically, nuclear electric energy was a spin-off from nuclear weapons production for the military. It gave an ideological justification for continued proliferation of nuclear technology around the world. It served to make nuclear fission appear more benevolent and promoted the myth that nuclear power was cheap and safe. It is neither.
The Green Party calls for a halt to nuclear contamination and to the continued production of nuclear wastes:
- Halt mining of uranium, much of which occurs on indigenous lands here and on other continents.
- Halt all U.S. research and development of new nuclear weapons systems and continue dismantling existing stocks.
- Stop U.S. involvement in international proliferation of nuclear weapons, and sign a meaningful Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty. [see Disarmament plank]
- Adopt a policy for the safest possible storage of existing radioactive materials, and discontinue attempting their "disposal" in land repositories. (What are "land repositories" in this case? This statement is self-contradictory, thus in effect nonsense. Sorry I have no revision for it yet. jgw110617)
- Rapidly phase out production of electric power generation from nuclear sources, decommission all existing nuclear power plants and oppose the construction of any new nuclear power plants.
- Curtail the medical profession's over use of radioactive isotopes in diagnostic and treatment procedures, and increase research for alternatives. (Does the GPCA have any responsibility to define how, what and when is "over use"? jgw110617)
- Recycle medical radioactive materials when possible, and develop storage-to-decay facilities for short-lived medical wastes.
- Ban shallow land disposal and incineration of all radioactive wastes.
- Overturn the Federal Price-Anderson Act, which limits the liability of the nuclear industry in the event of nuclear accidents.
- Hold all nuclear producers responsible in perpetuity for (the radioactive) wastes they generate.
- Establish strong, enforceable penalties for radioactive contamination of the environment. (Needs 1+ concrete examples of contamination levels, types and corresponding penalities. jgw110617)
- Disallow "deregulation" of any level of wastes to "Below Regulatory Concern" (BRC) status, or their use in consumer products.
- Establish independent monitoring networks for all military and civilian nuclear facilities.
- Ban irradiation of food products. (Fact: food radiation kills bad bacteria in the food, does not damage the proteins and other molecules that make food food, and does not leave the food radioactive. Suggested revision: Minimize irradiation of food products and label food products that have been irradiated. jgw110617)
- Ban nuclear materials in international transportation and trade.
- Ban nuclear materials aboard craft launched into space.
